肠道菌群 z-bio 2021-07-02 284

　　Purpose: To study the distribution and difference of the intestinal flora of the Oriental voles under wild laboratory rearing and living conditions?

　　Method: Do you use high-throughput sequencing technology for intestinal flora 16 SDNA? V4? Do you want to determine V5 and analyze the abundance of Oriental voles, statistical taxa (OTU), and bacterial species captured in laboratory and field sequences? Is it different from distribution?

　　Result: For the sparse curve, is the sample size reasonable, and is the ranking sufficient? At the phylum level, the distribution and ratio of the intestinal flora grown in the laboratory and the wild intestinal flora are basically the same. The experimental group has 1 endemic bacterium Lentisphaerae, and the wild group has 3 endemic phylum Fusobacterium? Yes. For phylums not classified as Taumarkeotaphyllum, is the difference in the abundance of the Tenericutes the largest? At the genus level, the intestinal bacteria of the voles are more abundant than those grown in the laboratory. The biggest difference is the abundance of luminal rumen cocci?

　　Conclusion: The difference in the structure of the intestinal flora of the Oriental voles under laboratory and wild conditions has been obtained, which further enriches the basic biological data of the Oriental voles.