Language
bd-xu
2020-04-10
915
The application deadline for the 2020 National Natural Science Foundation of China is April 20. In order to facilitate self-examination, the National Natural Science Foundation of China has recently published a special topic in the "China Science Foundation" magazine sponsored by its National Science Foundation: 2019 Science Fund Project Evaluation Work Overview. The content is mainly related to the review work of the project in 2019 and the work prospect in 2020.
In view of the fact that the current applicants are doing self-examination of the application form, the editor has excerpted the reason why the 2019 application is not accepted in the review for your reference.
1. Summary of 2019 National Natural Science Foundation Project Application, Evaluation and Funding
Hao Hongquan; Zheng Zhimin; Li Zhilan; Liu Yihong; Yu Xuan; Lei Rong; Wang Yan; Che Chengwei; Wang Changrui
After preliminary review in 2019, 4322 items were rejected, accounting for 1.72% of the total number of applications received. Among the inadmissible project applications, "the application code or the choice of the research field is wrong", "not included in the project guideline funding category", "the failure to provide supporting materials, recommendation letters, mentor consent letters, informed consent letters, and ethics The "Certificate of the Commission, etc." are the three main reasons for inadmissibility.
2. Summary of 2019 Fund Project Evaluation Work of the Ministry of Mathematics and Science
Chen Guochang; Zhang Panfeng; Xu Guangkui; Dong Guoxuan; Pu Yue; Meng Qingguo
In 2019, the Ministry of Mathematics and Science has a total of 131 projects that are not accepted. The main reasons for the rejection include:
(1) Key projects: mainly for reasons such as not filling in notes and instructions in accordance with the guidelines;
(2) General project: mainly because the supporting unit or the cooperative research unit does not have the official seal, the non-original copy or the name is inconsistent with the official seal, and fails to provide the certification materials, recommendation letters, mentor's consent letter, informed consent letter, and the applicant or main participation Applicants for reasons such as overrun;
(3) Youth Science Fund projects: mainly for failure to provide supporting materials, recommendation letters, tutors’ consent letters, informed consent letters, etc., and the lack of necessary information in the application resume.
Strictly handle high-similarity projects: In order to maintain the principles of fairness and impartiality of the National Natural Science Foundation of China, to ensure the effectiveness of funding, and to prevent plagiarism of other people’s applications or the use of funded projects to repeat applications such as scientific misconduct, the Natural Science Foundation of China The similarity check of the application form began in 2014. For high-similarity application projects with better communication evaluation opinions, the similarity comparison materials and the opinions of the Ministry of Science will be provided to the conference evaluation experts for reference by the expert group in decision-making. During the review period, each scientific office briefed the expert team on the project involved. After verification and discussion by the expert group, none of the above projects have received funding.
3. Summary of 2019 Fund Project Evaluation Work of the Ministry of Chemical Science
Cui Lin; Huang Yan; Fu Xuefeng; Chen Yongjun
351 project applications were rejected due to excessive violations and other reasons, accounting for 1.82% of the total number of project applications.
4. A summary of the 2019 annual fund project evaluation work of the Ministry of Life Sciences
Yin Wenxuan; Li Xiang; Gu Ruisheng; Feng Xuelian
In 2019, a total of 570 applications from the Ministry of Life Sciences were rejected due to non-compliance. Among them, 197 general projects, 99 youth science fund projects, 125 regional science fund projects, 22 key projects, 6 key international (regional) cooperative research projects, 5 outstanding youth science fund projects, and the National Outstanding Youth Science Fund 1 project, 1 innovative research group project, 1 basic science center project, 2 major scientific research equipment development projects (free application), 2 major research plan projects, 89 joint fund projects, etc. The reasons for the rejection are shown below table:
5. Summary of 2019 Earth Science Ministry Fund Project Review
Yao Yupeng; Zhang Chaolin; Zheng Yuanming; Liu Zhe; Li Jun; Wang Xibo; Sun Changqing; He Shuran; Huang Fang
The Department of Geosciences will not accept 300 projects in 2019.
There were 555 applications for key projects, and 52 were not accepted. The main reason was that the notes were not filled out as required, and the applicants or main participants had inconsistent job title information. 40 major international (regional) cooperative research projects were accepted, 3 of which were not accepted because the application did not fill in the funding period according to the guidelines. The main project application received 7774 items, 121 of which were not accepted. The main reason is that the applicant or main participant's job title information is inconsistent, the application is missing pages or items, the main participant's resume is missing, and the supporting unit or cooperative research unit is not covered. The official seal, the non-original or the name is inconsistent with the official seal, etc. There are 7481 applications for the Youth Science Foundation project, 66 of which are not accepted. The main reasons include the inconsistency of the applicant's job title information, the lack of pages or items in the application, the failure to provide supporting materials, recommendation letters, mentor consent letters, informed consent letters, and ethics The committee proves that it did not fill in the funding period according to the guidelines. There are 1208 applications for regional science fund projects, 41 of which are not accepted. The main reasons include the inconsistency of the applicant's professional title information, the lack of pages or items in the application, the failure to provide supporting materials, recommendation letters, mentor consent letters, informed consent letters, Ethics committee certification, and failure to fill in the funding deadline in accordance with the guidelines.
6. Summary of the 2019 project evaluation work of the Ministry of Engineering and Materials Science
Miao Hongyan; Wang Zhongzhong; Ding Yuqin; Hu Guangtao; Ye Bicui; Tan Yeqiang; Zhang Jianhua; Wang Guobiao; Gao Tiyue; Liming
In 2019, the Ministry of Engineering and Materials rejected 722 projects, including 343 general projects, 118 youth science funds, 83 regional science funds, 14 key projects, and 164 of them. The main reasons for inadmissibility are shown in the figure below:
7. Summary of 2019 Fund Project Evaluation Work of the Ministry of Information Science
Xie Guo; Wen Jun; Pan Qing; Li Jianjun; Zhang Zhaotian
In 2019, the Ministry of Information Science refused to accept 364 projects due to overruns and other violations (344 in the centralized acceptance period).
8. Summary of 2019 Fund Management Project Evaluation Work of the Ministry of Management Science
Li Ruojun; Li Jiangtao; He Yi; Yang Liexun; Liu Zuoyi
In 2019, the proportion of projects not accepted by the Ministry of Management Science was 2.62%, of which: 20.30% of the projects were not closed or had not provided the "Certificate of Finalization".
15.15% of the post-doctoral researchers at the station or those who had post-doctoral research experience but did not list the post-doctoral experience and the name of the cooperative tutor;
Relying on the unit or cooperative research unit did not affix the official seal, non-original or the name is inconsistent with the official seal accounted for 13.33% of the projects.
9. 2019 annual review of the fund project evaluation of the Ministry of Medical Sciences
Huo Minghe; Zhu Yuangui; Zhang Fengzhu; Official Lin; Zhu Weitong; Xu Yanying; Sun Ruijuan
In 2019, the Ministry of Medical Sciences had 1185 applications that failed the preliminary review. The main reasons for disapproval are shown in the table below:
▎Source: National Natural Science Foundation of China